Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+RA1792\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+RA1792\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RE: RA1792 (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:23:16 +0100; Dear Alberto, LF Group, While I would agree with most of the comments made about the RA1792, I have to say I have been using it for nearly 5 years now, and have done all my "best" LF reception with i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00201.html (11,998 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: RE: RA1792 (score: 1): Author: Marco Bruno <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 21:02:58 +0200; These receivers are now about 15 - 25 years old, so being realistic you will have to repair them from time to time. Having said that, the only thing I have had to do to mine is re-align the BFO VCO.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00203.html (10,649 bytes)
3. LF: Re: RE: RA1792 (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:32:40 +0100; Marco, Jim, Tracey, Laurie, Alan and Dave (am I forgetting somebody?) thanks for your opinions about that Rx. The latest messages seems to correct somehow the not so bright impression that initially; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00210.html (11,924 bytes)
4. LF: Re: RE: RA1792 (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:26:51 +0100; buy risk you for Hello Mal, a voice outside the choir ! It's always interesting to hear opinions dissenting from those of the others, as they can convey new information. So what you are suggesting t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00000.html (10,982 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]