Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+3\s+phase\s+ripple\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+3\s+phase\s+ripple\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RE: 3 phase ripple (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:11:34; I think your can make 2x1.41x120 = 338 V dc but I don't want to risk my life by not using a safety transformer! Of course savety is important, but there are other means to get there than just using a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00040.html (9,611 bytes)
2. LF: Re: RE: 3 phase ripple (score: 1): Author: "Tenty" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:10:24 +0100; We have 120 V, not 110 V.. Normal houses don't have 3 phases here as we have a very old fashion electricity system...:=( Every standard house here has 120 and 240 V (two phases)... 120 V (+90 degrees; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00045.html (10,960 bytes)
3. LF: Re: RE: 3 phase ripple (score: 1): Author: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:49:48 +0100; The RMS value is not really appropriate for this purpose Point taken. Whatever you do, be verrry careful about insulating things. John; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00052.html (9,049 bytes)
4. LF: Re: RE: 3 phase ripple (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:19:03 +0200; To All from PA0SE Andy, G4JNT, wrote: Using the standard mean UK supply of 234V rms nominal (405V phase voltage, peak = 573V) the rectified supply would be 573 volts max, so my earlier statement that; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00053.html (9,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]