Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+PhaseScope\s+beta\s+1\.0\s+release\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:38:34 +1200
OK agn, Scott/Murray I had another look at the phasescope pdf file and with an integration time of 300 or so seconds its obvious the effective b/w is waaay down. I guess I was just interested to see
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00174.html (13,048 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: "Murray ZL1BPU" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:29:19 +1200
Dave, Put it this way... I see a weak carrier at 20kHz that has varying day/night strength, but fairly constant phase. I've no way of verifying for sure where it's from, or whether it is keyed, as I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00175.html (11,544 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:44:28 +1200
Scott, Murray Fine. Tks for replies. I'm not concerned about the RX stability contribution-that's under control (or should be!) But for non-GPS disciplined TXs I wondered just how good they would hav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00176.html (14,147 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:32:37 -0700
Dave After rereading your question I think I missed the point... The TX needs to be GPS stablized. If it isn't the readout from the clicklock alg. will be meaningless at best and nothing at worst. Co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00177.html (13,455 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:22:46 -0700
Dave Your RX needs to be stable to within a Hz if it is Clicklock can deal with the variations... If the RX is say 2 Hz off calibration then simply offset the integer value set in phase scope to deal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00178.html (12,471 bytes)

6. LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:03:18 +1200
Hi Scott Wondering just how close to nominal does the tx have to be maintained to stay 'in view' so to speak? 73 Dave, ZL3FJ -- Original Message -- From: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]> To: "LWCA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00179.html (11,883 bytes)

7. LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:50:30 -0700
I forgot to mention in my instructions that the audio device setup stuff is not fully implemented. If you try and use anything other then the default the software will likely not function as desired.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00180.html (11,140 bytes)

8. LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Martinez" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:47:50 +0100
Scott: Further to my last re the PhaseScope instructions, I think the instructions relating to the PPS polarity might be faulty. If the PPS is inverted by the soundcard, the program will think the ne
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00181.html (11,729 bytes)

9. LF: Re: PhaseScope beta 1.0 release... (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Martinez" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:18:53 +0100
From G3PLX: Just a couple of words about the PhaseScope program that Scott VE7TIL has written, and the ClickLock technique at the heart of it. Some of this repeats earlier postings, but I thought it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-04/msg00182.html (13,657 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu