Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+PA0RDT\s+whip\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+PA0RDT\s+whip\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: PA0RDT whip (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:15:31 +0100; May be noise implications with the larger voltage drop of a conventional diode .. a foreword conducting diode is a noise source ... so perhaps a reverse larger derive across the supply would be more; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00099.html (10,082 bytes)
2. LF: Re: PA0RDT whip (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:02:47 +0100; Hi John, It just gives a lower voltage drop but the unit only takes about 60mAmax I think. A Si would do the job. Alan G3NYK -- Original Message -- From: "John Rabson" <[email protected]> To: <rsg; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00474.html (10,296 bytes)
3. LF: RE: PA0RDT whip (score: 1): Author: "Dave G3WCB." <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:07:19 +0100; Nope. 1N4001, 1N4007 or any similar plastic 1A diode would do the job. Or you could leave it out if you were confident that you wouldn't connect up the power supply the wrong way round :-) 73, Dave G; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00644.html (10,664 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Re: PA0RDT whip (score: 1): Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 09:33:08 +0100; Many thanks everyone for the info. John F5VLF; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00691.html (8,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]