Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Notch\s+for\s+DCF39\s+\[G3NYK\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Notch\s+for\s+DCF39\s+\[G3NYK\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Notch for DCF39 [G3NYK] (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:09:08 EST; << This is the wrong way to achieve high impedance (and good IMD), it is no need to keep the "source current low" {etc} >> I do not see anything in the Web page that suggests keeping the source curre; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00109.html (8,612 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Notch for DCF39 [G3NYK] (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:49:32 +0100; Hi, noticed something I'd wish to comment further, ref. quoted text from http://www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk/BR-t-Notch.htm As far as I can see at the moment the only problem is that the output of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-01/msg00110.html (11,313 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]