Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+NDBs\s+\&\s+WRC\-12\s+LF\s+band\s+allocation\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:22:37 +0000 (GMT)
Now you are talking Mal ...... :-) Propose it! 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: mal hamilton <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 15:09 Subject: Re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00096.html (19,353 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:10:15 +0000
I had a morse key, sold it at a rally recently - got quite a lot for it surprisingly.  An old airforce brass pounder thing that some enthusiast wanted.  I used to do CW occasionally.  Once took part 
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00161.html (17,289 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:18:10 +0000
73 Eddie G3ZJO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00179.html (10,497 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:02 +0000 (GMT)
OK Mal It's a great idea for those like my self who enjoys CW although not good at it. I find a great deal of satisfaction completing even a short CW qso over any other mode of qso. As far as NDB goe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00216.html (25,058 bytes)

5. LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "Tracey Gardner" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:52:12 +0100
Hello Ken I doubt it, but you never know. I've just checked our Received In Europe (REU) database and there are some 29 inactive NDBs listed in the 472-479kHz range. If they were all to become active
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00245.html (13,275 bytes)

6. LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:04:25 +0100
Dear Mal, Ken, LF Group, One does not need to be a morse code expert to realise there is a strong signal repeating the same dots and dashes 24 hours a day on a particular frequency. One just needs a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00365.html (14,796 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:42:30 +0100
Pete This proposal is common sense, considering the Primary users are all CW navigational safety BEACONS and surely OFCOM and the RSGB know this. If they arrived at any other decision it would be unw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00428.html (21,869 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:10:04 +0000
That''s OK Dave, if Mal's opinion won the day, then this amateur would never use the band.  I will not use Morse.  I intensely dislike it   So one way or the other one of us would populate the freque
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00439.html (13,658 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:55:33 +0100
On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:48CET, mal hamilton wrote: Andy I would encourage you to get a morse key and have a Go, one has to be positive !! Surely he did. He is a G4. John F5VLF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00465.html (12,577 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:11:11 +0100
The band should be licensed for CW operators only so that they could recognize and read the CW beacons and AVOID them. Has OFCOM thought of this. Neither should there be any amateur unattended BEACON
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00481.html (16,059 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:49:30 +0100
Andy This statement sounds like a self confessed Appliance Operator Amateur you could at least try CW for a while. Intensely dislike seems strong. I even tried Opera and do not dislike it or any Data
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00490.html (14,437 bytes)

12. LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:36:01 +0100
We have shared frequency bands with professionals for many years and have used a wide variety of modes of transmission. I see no need to make regulations to restrict the use of CW on MF. Obviously, a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00520.html (11,854 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:50:03 +0100
Some private emails I am getting agree with Andy, cw made them sick with symptoms similar to Yellow Fever or Colera. The problem turned out to be Asymetrical Ears where one ear had a different captur
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00601.html (18,448 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:20:12 +0000
Hi all. Following on from Tracey's info what would be the various regulators reaction be if we were crowded out of this band as we only have on a secondary basis. 73. Ken. M00KHW Sent from my BlackBe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00618.html (16,061 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:04:47 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Jim and group Non flyer's seem to think an air pilot just uses instruments to the exclusion of all other senses. I have done flight training on light aircraft, gliders and mixed with professional
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00636.html (17,834 bytes)

16. LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:52:15 +0100
If such a rule built into the permits for this band then this amateur for one will never consider using it. 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00646.html (11,478 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:09 +0100
MF, Am 28.02.2012 01:02, schrieb James Moritz: [...] if someone navigating an aircraft sets their ADF receiver to a particular beacon frequency and hears an assortment of amateur-generated morse code
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00745.html (12,403 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu