Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+MF\s+JT9\-2\s+report\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: MF JT9-2 report (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:02:26 +0000
Hello Paul, currently you have to subtract 3dB for JT9-2 and 7dB for JT9-5 to get the "true" SNR. A new version of SlowJT9, with correct reports and the cycle bug fixed, will be uploaded later today.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00218.html (10,711 bytes)

2. LF: Re: MF JT9-2 report (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:20:10 +0000
Paul, all, before I started programming SlowJT9 I did a "dry test" by generating JT9(-1) and JT9-2 WAV files with a known SNR and feeding these to the JT9 decoder of the WSJT-X suite (the JT9-2 WAV f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00219.html (10,786 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: MF JT9-2 report (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:40:38 -0500
Hello Rik, v0.9.02 installed and monitoring 630m JT9-2 here. Yes of course. The drift I measured was the actual RF drift of the signal, measured visually with a high resolution waterfall external to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00225.html (14,201 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: MF JT9-2 report (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:22:14 +0000
Hello Paul, decoder.txt seems OK. I am sorry if I gave the impression that I thought you were complaining. Certainly not, all reports on crashes are abnormal behaviour are welcome. But these rare cra
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00230.html (12,431 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: MF JT9-2 report (score: 1)
Author: ik1hgi Qrss Qrpp <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:01:07 +0100
problem on the JT9-2 system I see no coding I have been in rx 2 hours nothing .... in the system JT9-1 worked very well on 5 hours last night I think it's an important problem to carefully put in the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00248.html (17,000 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: MF JT9-2 report (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:46:45 +0000
Hello Antionio, the signal just above 1200Hz is most likely WSPR (by counting pixels I estimate its length at 110 seconds, a JT9-2 transmissions takes only 98 seconds). Either someone transmitting ou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00253.html (18,109 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu