For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for Receiving, little or large but the bigger the bet
Well Mr Mal, We US of A operators don't have any LF Amateur Radio bands so we can't drive our loops with the same level of power you run. I don't know why Bill Ashlock hasn't jumped in here, but in m
<snip> I invite you to come to my house and build whatever wire vertical you can on my lot. I have the Ashlock TX loop in the air already. We can operate under my Part-5 license with high power if y
Well... That may not always be the case. If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that everything is accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it. It is too e
Well... That may not always be the case. If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that everything is accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it. [...] You
I disagree. To the best of my knowledge the E-H antennas never demonstrated anything more than one would expect from what they were.; ie short antennas with inductive centre loading and capacitative
Well... That may not always be the case. If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that everything is accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it. It is too
However anomolous results can also be of interest. For example, it is not uncommon for researchers to sweep minor, irritating, results under the table. Any anomalous results are of grate interest! Bu
Actually, that is not strictly true. If an experiment does not agree with theory then both the experiment and the theory need to be re-evaluated and both require validation and revue by a peer group.
Bingo, 'Ego Trip'. Mike WE0H WD2XGI [email protected] wrote: Actually, that is not strictly true. If an experiment does not agree with theory then both the experiment and the theory need to be re-evaluat
Hallo Bryan, Alberto and All, let me tell my own experience with an E/H-antenna. [...] Results, receiving: The signals are in general 2 to 3 S-stages lower than from the dipole. Walter, thanks for s
hi jim, tnx for reading ur interesting talk on antennas. i suppose, that we will meet in london in july. i will give a historical on the SAQ world heritage. 73 de carl -- Carl-Henrik Walde SM5BF <inf
Dear LF Group, At M0BMU, the original motivation for using seperate RX antennas was the increasing 50Hz-related noise level on the TX vertical. This seems to be due to pick-up from the house mains wi
smaller verts/loops welcome. Mal - during our last TransPacific tests with ZL, we had the opportunity to run two rx's on the ZL frequency. One was our mainstay and always reliable performer, the lar
Hello Mal, I have been testing a tuneable loop antenna against my mini-whip and did not find any difference in receiving weak daytime signals in the 270 - 430 kHz range. At home I have been on and of
