Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\s+power\s+amplifiers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 22:16:44 +0100
Dear All, First of all I wish to thank all those who sent in material for the LF book and also for those who have given permission for me to use material from their websites. It is interesting that w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00212.html (10,160 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:13:42 +1200
Most LF PA designs employ FETs in class D push-pull, with the output taken via a transformer. A Pi section filter is then used to remove the harmonics. The documentation on the Decca transmitter mod
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00213.html (10,146 bytes)

3. LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 02:30:32 EDT
I'm not sure that I would agree a single-ended push-pull output is significantly easier to bias; linear biasing of "floating" transistors is done all the time in audio power amplifers, such as are fr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00214.html (12,083 bytes)

4. LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:44:20 +0100
Referring to John KD4IDY's note - I cannot help but feel a bit uneasy about the use of class D amplifiers followed by conventional shunt C series L pi-section filters - although the designs using the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00216.html (16,123 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "Cliff Buttschardt" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 00:01:02 +0000
Screw that AOL!!! John, these damn fool people out to prove that the silliest error on the part of the "subscriber" is the guy that is paying the bill. I have learned to hate that fool outfit. Us "no
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00235.html (8,683 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "William H Lake" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 05:25:23 -0700
Well Said!!!!!!! Bill Screw that AOL!!! John, these damn fool people out to prove that the silliest error on the part of the "subscriber" is the guy that is paying the bill. I have learned to hate th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00245.html (9,008 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: LF power amplifiers (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:22:25 +1200
I also experimented with a bridge circuit (a modification of a surplus SMPS, but not using rectified mains). I had a "blow up" and it took out all four MOSFETs. In earlier days for LF transmitting I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00253.html (10,467 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu