Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\s+activity\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: "rn3agc" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:43:20 +0300
Hello Stefan, Yes, it is mine "A" :) I try to work on JA7NI: http://ja7ni.pv.land.to/argo It is improbable, but... 73 Andrey LF, If the "A" that transmitted since 17:30 UTC on 137.7775 kHz is from An
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00128.html (9,039 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:26:06 +0100
Aah ok :-) So good luck! Maybe i should try it too, on saturday ;-) 73, Stefan Am 30.11.2010 20:43, schrieb rn3agc: Hello Stefan, Yes, it is mine "A" :) I try to work on JA7NI: http://ja7ni.pv.land.t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00229.html (9,533 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:10:22 +0000
Hi Andrey Yes NI's grabber is back up I tried for it as well. I heard he had plans to make a permanent RX loop antenna at his RX site to compliment his beverage(s). JA1CGM was noted to be active once
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00299.html (9,998 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:31:29 +0100
Scott, What would be the best time for a LF TX test to VE7? Maybe i can manage to do this on saturday. Is there a chance to do it just arround the sunset in Germany? You know, i mustn't fly the 300m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00275.html (12,982 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: "rn3agc" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 02:20:46 +0300
Hi Scott, Hi Andrey Yes NI's grabber is back up I tried for it as well. I heard he had plans to make a permanent RX loop antenna at his RX site to compliment his beverage(s). JA1CGM was noted to be a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00513.html (11,225 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 05:03:42 +0000
Gents DCF39 is making a FB show here tonight 30+dB over noise on the plot. Geomagnetic condx have settled down very nicely. 153 plot showing well above average signals and VOR (non polar path) showin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00804.html (12,188 bytes)

7. LF: Re: LF Activity (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 14:05:11 +0100
I'm not sure wether its my imagination but the Loran does not seem to be quite as bad as it used to be. Or perhaps the transmitters and antennas are more efficient now On the night when John was on w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00121.html (8,267 bytes)

8. LF: Re: LF Activity (score: 1)
Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 11:37:39 -0400
I also heard a QSO on 136.57 one of the operators sending at about 15WPM. I also heard a station on 137.11 calling QRZ Who was it? Peter, it depends on the time. I had a nice QSO with my neighbor DJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00125.html (8,239 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: LF Activity (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:55:51 PDT
"I'm not sure whether its my imagination but the Loran does not seem to be quite as bad as it used to be. Or perhaps the transmitters and antennas are more efficient now......" On the contrary, at th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00126.html (8,565 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:25:54
To be honest I don't understand most of the 'newcomers' problem. Regarding the receiver : 136kHz is CW only (apart from a rare PSK / BPSK signal), so the ability to copy CW is the first need. I assum
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00094.html (9,419 bytes)

11. LF: Re: LF activity (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:38:34 +0000
Dear LF Group, I have no experience of contest operating, so I will not offer judgement as to whether I think it is a good idea or not. However, I am not convinced by the argument that the band is to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00095.html (10,705 bytes)

12. LF: Re: Lf activity (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:28:20 +0100
Still looking for 136 KHz skeds rather than random from GM. If you want to try please email Regards Simon GM4PLM Hi Simon. GM3YXM/Galloway and MM0ALM/Aberdeen have worked just about everyone around.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-04/msg00161.html (8,648 bytes)

13. LF: Re: LF Activity (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 18:25:09 +0100
Hi all, reading the mail it looks like I got everything back together again just in time. Have put out a couple of tests and one CQ on 137.7 just in case anyone was watching. Haven't finished all th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00214.html (9,832 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu