Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\s+Receivers\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:11:39 +0100
I am working on the Receiver chapter for the LF book. I have a good introduction written by John 4GVC (with a description of the TS850, which caused many of us, including myself, to go this route) bu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00259.html (8,856 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:55:23
For what it is worth : I use a Kenwood TS440 on LF, sensitivity is OK and if the internal 20dB attenuator is used the IM behaviour is very good (using my 'big' antenna for reception). 73, Rik ON7YD A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00260.html (9,624 bytes)

3. LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:42:07 +0100
I use a Racal RA1792. Gradually becoming available on the surplus market now, at prices coming down from 'silly'. They started at £1000 a few years ago but are now appearing at £400- £500 and ought t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00263.html (12,616 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Peter, Several of us are using the AOR7030 and are very pleased with it. Others that I know of are Vaino Lehtoranta OH2LX and Alan Melia G3NYK. Unfortunately I have no other rx to compare it with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00268.html (9,264 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Toni" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:07:54 +0200
Hello Peter, I'm using a Harris RF590 for LF reception, followed by a Timewave DSP-599zx. The Harris tunes from 10KHz up to 30MHz and is available on the surplus market. It was in widespread use in m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00272.html (10,905 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 22:20:56 +0200
In 21.38 18/05/00 , hai scritto: I am working on the Receiver chapter for the LF book. I have a good introduction written by John 4GVC (with a description of the TS850, which caused many of us, inclu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00274.html (9,907 bytes)

7. LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:52:26 +0100
Marco et al .. I feel cheated - everyone else seems to have 1 Hz steps :-( By IF passband tuning, do you mean the use of the 1kHz and 300 Hz filters on SSB ? For a time before getting an IC746 transc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00280.html (10,119 bytes)

8. LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:39:25 +0100
I feel cheated - everyone else seems to have 1 Hz steps The TS-850 readout resolution is 10Hz. However the tuning appears 'smooth' between the digits. When I set the receiver for slow CW the receiver
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00282.html (8,773 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 13:29:26 +0200
The TS-850 readout resolution is 10Hz. However the tuning appears 'smooth' between the digits. When I set the receiver for slow CW the [snip] What happens when you press the 'Fine' button on the num
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00283.html (8,414 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 21:35:33 +0200
Marco et al .. I feel cheated - everyone else seems to have 1 Hz steps :-( Well, it is a software problem, the synthesizer IS CAPABLE of 1 Hz steps, but the software limits to 10 Hz. I can't explain
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00285.html (9,642 bytes)

11. LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 19:44:43 +0100
What happens when you press the 'Fine' button on the numeric keypad ? Doesn't the tuning step go down to 1 Hz ? Time to dig out again the manual... I think the tuning step is 1Hz all the time. All t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00286.html (8,172 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 22:37:28 +0200
I think the tuning step is 1Hz all the time. All the FINE control does is change the tuning rate of the tuning knob to the display. The display shows 10Hz resolution whatever you do - unless there i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00287.html (8,523 bytes)

13. LF: Re: LF receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 07:31:53 +0100
Alberto di Bene wrote I made a simple test. Using the Up-Down pushbuttons on the mike, the step for each pression is 10 Hz or 1 Hz depending on the 'Fine' setting. The display has the resolution fixe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00291.html (8,276 bytes)

14. LF: Re: LF Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:33:49 -0400
Andy, But isn't the accuracy and stability of a cheap colour subcarrier xtal, pulled more than 100ppm from its normal operating point, going to swamp the values you derive from the 'nice' numbers gen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00198.html (9,043 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu