Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\s+Propagation\s+thoughts\s+$and\s+antenna\,\s+too$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+LF\s+Propagation\s+thoughts\s+$and\s+antenna\,\s+too$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: LF Propagation thoughts (and antenna, too) (score: 1): Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:48:50 +0100; Some thoughts on 136 kHz Ionospheric propagation Sorry for this not being in phase with T/A ideas. ................. On the practicability of talking about "hops" Suggested experiment: Draw a circle; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00081.html (10,306 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: LF Propagation thoughts (and antenna, too) (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 10:48:43; At 21:48 6/02/00 +0100, IK1ODO wrote: I have a question for antenna modelling gurus (G3LDO?) What is the vertical radiation pattern of our shortened verticals? Is it dependent of ground resistance an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00084.html (11,905 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: LF Propagation thoughts (and antenna, too) (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 13:15:42 EST; Rik writes: Regarding the groundresistance the rules was : the lesser the better. No only for the sake of antenna effeciency but also to avoid radiation at higher angles. This 'high angle radiation'; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00093.html (12,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]