Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Jason\s+Tests\s+signalling\s+comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Jason\s+Tests\s+signalling\s+comparison\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Jason Tests signalling comparison (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:02:25 +0100; I think Alberto is using a 2^17 long FFT on an 11025 Hz sampling rate, so each FFT bin occupies 0.084Hz. Windowing of the FFT data is usually done which widens the effective bandwidth - a Hamming wi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00095.html (10,281 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Jason Tests signalling comparison (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:45:02 +0000; Dear Andy, LF Group, At 14:54 24/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: All three of these modes use the same basic technique, looking for the presence or absence of a signal in a given bandwidth - in the case of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00105.html (10,942 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Jason Tests signalling comparison (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:44:46 EST; Dear Jim, ufb copy " M0BMU M0BMU JASON92 " on 135918, now at 23:30. As a late reply to your posting of Jan 24th (still catching up after a holiday): ... The Jason signal is equivalent to 17 separate; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00231.html (8,723 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]