Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Fast\s+CW\s+and\s+big\s+antennas\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Fast\s+CW\s+and\s+big\s+antennas\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1): Author: "ComPact" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:08:14 +1200; Yes, well put Steve. It's such a pity to spoil a wonderful reflector with so much malcontent. We had an interesting LF test round last Thursday night with most signals in the South Island enhanced by; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00283.html (8,209 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:29:09 +0100; We had an interesting LF test round last Thursday night with most signals in the South Island enhanced by around 12dB. This coincided with reports of aurora although there was no sign of flutter on 8; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00285.html (8,826 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1): Author: "ComPact" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:40:03 +1200; There was an X-class flare (biggest) on the 21st (Tuesday) and at 1848UTC on the 23rd (Thursday). Thanks for the flare info Mike. The tests were Thursday evening here so preceded the second flare but; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00294.html (8,511 bytes)
4. LF: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1): Author: "Peter Dodd" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:07:57 +0100; From Steve Thanks to the many who replied directly to me re my comments. I am encouraged that there is a 'silent majority' out there who share the same sentiments. You would be suprised on just how m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00296.html (9,748 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]