Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+CFH\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:54:10 +0100
Stefan es Co This is the optimum time of year for DX on both LF es MF. This has consistantly been the case over the years. It peaks about now and will start to drop off gradually but still useable th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00327.html (9,238 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 19:11:08 +0100
Mal, Am 12.01.2013 17:52, schrieb mal hamilton: Stefan es Co This is the optimum time of year for DX on both LF es MF. This has consistantly been the case over the years. It peaks about now and will
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00370.html (9,683 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:24:16 +0100
Stefan I am more interested in MF having spent many years on LF. Venezuela would be nice on LF but he is not in QSO mode so not really interested 73 gl de mal/g3kev start across results
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00762.html (9,613 bytes)

4. LF: re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:38:52 +0100
From Dave G3YMC G3KEV reports hearing RTTY signals on 137.0kHz. Last winter and the year before I consistently heard CFH around the dawn period at s9++. I have heard nothing now for many months, and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00176.html (7,991 bytes)

5. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Pick" <>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 22:44:54 +0100
Mal. No sign of anything here at 2140 gmt, even on the Spectrogram display. I heard you working Reino this evening but he was a better copy this morning, no QRN. Dave G3YXM. I wonder if anyone else c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00182.html (8,324 bytes)

6. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 09:22:06 +0100
I heard CFH yesterday afternoon at over s9 - not far off the signal I copy it (when it is on) at dawn. Normally when I hear it in the daytime it is much much weaker. Are we sure we are listening to C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00241.html (9,033 bytes)

7. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 17:12:10 +0000
Dear LF Group, I heard CFH transmitting FSK on 137.0k last night - I didn't stop to measure it, but it seemed to be only moderately strong here compared to how it was on "good" nights last year. The
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-02/msg00248.html (9,628 bytes)

8. LF: RE: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 18:19:38 -0400
Question: About the same chance as walking up to the door at Cutler, Maine and asking them what they are doing. Larry VA3LK
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00113.html (8,152 bytes)

9. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:56:56 +0100
Gary, I have been seeing CFH from about 1900z when I started monitoring with Spec Lab. When did it start transmitting again? I'd say within the last two hours. John Andrews
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00265.html (8,262 bytes)

10. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:47:25 +0100
Hi Dave yup its there though not that strong with me yet. Keep an eye it has been going of around 2400z a lot recently....I guess the night shift want a bit of peace !! Alan Dear all. Big mess in the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00075.html (9,557 bytes)

11. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:47:31 +0100
Dave, Big mess in the middle of the band tonight. I assume that's CFH loud, proud and wide? YES, THAT'S CFH. Errrr.... sorry. I have to yell to be heard over the racket. John Andrews, W1TAG
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00076.html (9,162 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" <>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:30:48 -0800
I wonder why the Navy is even running those things now... Most of our ships are overseas and our sub fleet is 'grounded.' Hi Dave yup its there though not that strong with me yet. Keep an eye it has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00077.html (10,100 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:42:11 -0500
Has anyone ever checked with the power companies to see what, if anything, they do to protect the power grid in the vicinity of CFH and other LF transmitters? Jay I wonder why the Navy is even runnin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00078.html (11,164 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" <>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 17:06:52 -0800
Jay Here in the lower mainland BC where CKN is located the electrical grid is controlled via microwave links. Only some remote places such as some locations on Vancouver Is have older LF stuff for co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00079.html (11,396 bytes)

15. LF: Re: CFH (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:23:47 +0100
I cant see it here yet Jay but I am using a very very low Marconi ....most of it on the floor. Alan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-02/msg00124.html (9,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu