Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Active\s+antennas\s+on\s+136kHz\,\s+additional\s+wire\s+needed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Active\s+antennas\s+on\s+136kHz\,\s+additional\s+wire\s+needed\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Active antennas on 136kHz, additional wire needed? (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:43:52 +0100; Chris, It should not be necessary. The E-field probe couples to the incomming wavefront capacitively and extra wire adds little to this. The secret is the "size" of the segment of wavefront you inter; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-09/msg00181.html (11,714 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Active antennas on 136kHz, additional wire needed? (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:05:02 +0200; Hello Chris, The "PCB-antenna" is equivalent to a 1 feet rod and though counter intuitive, adding one won't help. As with all active whip designs, at VLF / LF / MW and lower HF the whip is NOT the an; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-09/msg00182.html (10,588 bytes)
3. Re[2]: LF: Re: Active antennas on 136kHz, additional wire needed? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:22:22 +0100; Hello rsgb, Tuesday, September 29, 2015 Thanks for the info "from the horse's mouth", and I sympathize with your predicament of people selling your design commercially. In this case I just received a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-09/msg00184.html (11,778 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]