Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+A\s+simple\s+ULF\/MF\s+diplexer\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+A\s+simple\s+ULF\/MF\s+diplexer\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:36:26 +0000; Hi Stefan, if you can keep both transmitters from feeding power into each other it should work. But one thing to keep in mind is that the 2nF parallel capacitor needed on ULF will reduce the overall; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00147.html (10,658 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:18:13 +0200; Hi Rik, OK, a picture tells more than 1000 words: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/ULF/ULF_MF_Diplexer.jpg While drawing the picture i saw that i had to correct my idea. The transformer s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00148.html (11,343 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: A simple ULF/MF diplexer? (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:53:06 +0000; Hi Stefan, the picture makes clear what you intend to do. A possible pitfall could be the behaviour of the 1.3H coil at 475kHz (self resonances). 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-08/msg00149.html (12,433 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]