Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+136kHz\s+weak\s+signals\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 136kHz weak signals (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Dodd" <>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 05:58:44 GMT
Last night, 14/2, at around 2035UT I saw I5TGG . His signal was 137.726kHz on my scale calling CQ but the signal faded out. Just a little earlier a strong QRSS signal at 137.729 is GM3YXM/P was seen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00257.html (9,416 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: 136kHz weak signals (score: 1)
Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 07:27:04 +0200
Hi Peter, I am interested to see the .JPG picture, please... Suffer from bad ICM above 137.5 kHz, also something on 136.1..136.3, wonder if SXV is causing it. Checked CFH this morning around 0330 but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00259.html (10,476 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: 136kHz weak signals (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:11:10 +0100
It turned out to be sending the same data as GM3YXM/P but with a mystery delay timing difference of around three seconds. Hello Peter, SPECTRAN takes some time to process the input signal, maybe thre
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00266.html (9,545 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: 136kHz weak signals (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:30:47
I had the same idea as Marco, or was it the first EME (moonbounce) signal heard on 136kHz (.... ..) 73, Rik It turned out to be sending the same data as GM3YXM/P but with a mystery delay timing diffe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00287.html (10,096 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu