Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+136\s+khz\s+LF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+136\s+khz\s+LF\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 136 khz LF (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:32:46 +0200; hamilton mal wrote: Using speclab this is what was indicated. Nothing calibrated. Relative measurement signal above noise floor 55 db. I expect to be really meaningful the system needs to be calibrat; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00005.html (9,961 bytes)
2. LF: Re: 136 khz LF (score: 1): Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 00:06:55 +0100; You can't possibly mean -5dBm. Even if propagation were line of sight, at 200km distance (near enough between you ?) Free space loss = 32.4+20LOG(f.d) [MHz, km] = 61dB. EIRP max 30dBm so max power re; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00010.html (9,887 bytes)
3. LF: Re: 136 khz LF (score: 1): Author: "dj9dw" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 17:36:21 +0200; -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] hamilton mal To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 3:58 PM Subject: LF: 136 khz LF Band quie; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-10/msg00031.html (9,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]