Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+\[rsgb_lf_group\]\s+Getting\s+rid\s+of\s+Black\s+Sheep\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:40:26 +0100
Yes 'Flash' traffic only on the ref G. Gentlemen, Im beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00080.html (11,685 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: Clive Lorton <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:15:54 +0100
If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the voting period ends.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00084.html (13,190 bytes)

3. LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:00:06 +0200
On 6/4/2012 4:29 PM, Steve Dove wrote: Here and now, a 'QSO' group and a 'Technical' group seem like a really good idea, but nobody, I mean nobody, has that kind of discipline - eventually a dilute m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00157.html (11,835 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:05:42 +0100
Good idea Graham. I hope the blacksheep will continue. mal/g3kev Blacksheep technical and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00222.html (12,292 bytes)

5. LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:54:01 +0200
I have already voted on the Poll feature of Yahoo (another useful tool of that system), but let me voice here again my complete agreement about the switching to the new system, and the closing down o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00225.html (10,650 bytes)

6. RE: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: "Ken" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:11:46 +0100
Gentlemen. I think it a very good idea to have a technical/qso split, this is why I voted to keep both. I would also be very useful if possible to be able to contact members direct through either sit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00226.html (15,138 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:19:31 +0100
John Please take note. There is an ever increasing case across the world to retain Blacksheep for those of us actually working on the lower frequencies in QSO daily. Quick reports, alerts, and small
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00262.html (10,301 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:04:00 +0100
I prefer any information of interest to me to be stored on my computer and not some central storage outside my control. The advantage of individual storage is that not all the eggs are in one basket
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00293.html (13,395 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: Clive Lorton <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:04:48 +0100
Gentlemen, Im beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO informati
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00300.html (10,796 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:05:33 +0100
Yes, I agree too. It's the best piece of common sense there's been for a while about this. Well done Clive! Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]> To: <rsgb_lf_grou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00320.html (14,138 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: pws <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 19:30:28 +0200
Hi Alberto, You wrote: ... Too many times when I was searching for postings that could be useful for me for one or another reason, I sorely felt the lack of a searchable archive on the old and outdat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00436.html (10,843 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:51:28 +0100
Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving mails from two sources personally. Eddie G. Gentlemen, Im beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacks
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00477.html (12,358 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: John Gibbs <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:06:58 -0700
I'm with Clive on this idea.... Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/constru
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00622.html (9,668 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:43:55 +0200
Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable" or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the future. There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement driven
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00662.html (11,662 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu