That's because no one sends anything in !!!!!!!!!!!!!! As I said in a previous posting a few months ago to one of the many groups (microwaves, probably) - its positive feedback. People see reduced te
David is quite wrong in thinking that any lack of technical articles in RadCom is because the Editor wants a quiet life. There is almost no backlog of construction articles, but many on expeditions e
Dave If anything was to be made for 500 and possibly 137 , I would suggest a 'Linea transverter' would possibly be the most useful, solving the problems of poor receiver performance and the ability t
In a message dated 18/07/2008 19:56:24 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: That's because no one sends anything in !!!!!!!!!!!!!! As I said in a previous posting a few months ago to
Hello John, WKL, and group. I think it may have been me who picked up Mal's _expression_ "fizzled out" and applied it to the technical content, in particular construction articles, in Rad Com. Trying
Not speculation, I've had several discussions with him on the subject, and my idea of Radcom going unstable had him quite amused. But it is a feedback situation, and as in all control systems, the wr
