Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RTTY\s+vs\.MFSK\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:30:42 +0100
Stefan's RTTY beacon is starting to come through now. There have been periodic strong bursts of signal on 438.2kHz over the last hour or so, sounds like RTTY but fldigi not decoding using same settin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00202.html (13,209 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:48:42 -0500
Stefan This info might be useful. http://www.w1tag.com/600M_Modes.htm http://www.w1tag.com/Modes.htm Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 -- Original Message -- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00311.html (14,016 bytes)

3. Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:12:35 +0100
Hi Eddie, Yes, i can try. However i have no idea if it will be "better". Not an expert on the subject. What i like is such a fast mode like RTTY, maybe 40 Baud would be fine as well, but not much slo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00354.html (13,322 bytes)

4. Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:18:04 +0100
Am 06.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: [...] I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG. Sorry, aborted. It is much to slow and so it is uninteresting when thinking about a real QSO mode.. How fast
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00373.html (11,652 bytes)

5. Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:53:12 +0000
It is not that slow and if it is the difference between a QSO and not, it is worth a try. I see something now what mode is that? Amtor is about the same as the RTTY you have been trying. Eddie Am 06.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00519.html (12,029 bytes)

6. Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:22:28 +0000
MFSK4 is slower than RTTY but live keyboard mode and has FEC. I am looking for you now Yes, i can try. However i have no idea if it will be "better". Not an expert on the subject. What i like is such
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00592.html (13,596 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu