Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RTTY\s+Protocol\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RTTY\s+Protocol\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RTTY Protocol (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:18:40 +0000; Hi Minto On 06/03/2013 11:09, Minto Witteveen wrote: Hmm might this be because in the old days (amateur) RTTY was done with the rig in LSB mode using AFSK? Yes, hence the confusion. With mark at 212; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00002.html (19,797 bytes)
2. LF: RTTY Protocol (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:44:33 +0000; Graham Just confirmed by test, MMTTY is backwards compared to all other Software. Others idle on the high tone MMTTY idles on the low, unless the REV is pressed. From Wiki the upper tone used for idl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00148.html (9,622 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RTTY Protocol (score: 1): Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:09:50 +0100; Hmm might this be because in the old days (amateur) RTTY was done with the rig in LSB mode using AFSK? With mark at 2125 Hz and space at 2295 hz and mark being the idling position, when using LSB the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00426.html (13,486 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]