Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+adding\s+a\s+L\s+into\s+a\s+300m\s+LF\s+vertical\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+adding\s+a\s+L\s+into\s+a\s+300m\s+LF\s+vertical\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: adding a L into a 300m LF vertical? (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:35:03 +0100; Dear Stefan, LF Group, _Questions:_ Is my calculation reasonably useful? Would YOU add that coil in a height of 100m above GND? I have found with NEC simulations that they give you a reasonable idea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00188.html (12,593 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: adding a L into a 300m LF vertical? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:18:51 +0100; Jim, Rik, Thank you for your reply and point of view. So, i'll let the coil on the bottom although the wind will be VERY strong tomorrow and on sunday. The kite will be strong enough to pull my car i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00681.html (12,424 bytes)
3. LF: RE: adding a L into a 300m LF vertical? (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:42:25 +0100; Hello Stefan, your calculations seems very resaonable to me. But if I compare it to the "classic" antenna with loading coil at ground level, I am not sure that it is worth the effort. Using MMana-Gal; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg01072.html (14,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]