Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+TM5AST\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+TM5AST\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: TM5AST (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:51:33 +0200; Phew, they must have really tremendous QRN down there ! Hpe cul, 73 DF0WD / DL4YHF . --; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00072.html (7,900 bytes)
2. LF: RE: TM5AST (score: 1): Author: "Dave G3WCB" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 00:08:45 +0100; Dear Michel & LF, Very strong sigs from TM5AST received in IO91RM. They are currently being called by myself in QRSS3/10, DF0WD in HELL/QRSS3, DL2HRE in DFCW3/QRSS3. and another unid D station in DFC; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00074.html (10,514 bytes)
3. LF: Re: TM5AST (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:27:30 +0200; Greetings all, Just working TM5AST in QRSS6(-ish), due to QRN. Their kite is 160 m AGL, which may explain the big difference in signal strength. If any of the US guys receives this message in time, h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00075.html (8,353 bytes)
4. LF: Re: TM5AST (score: 1): Author: "F6CWN" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:32:23 +0100; 21./06/2005 2023z Hi Mal and the list, The correct call (in 2005) was TM 5 AST We made a mistake at the beginning of the transmission, (memory problem with QRSS software and >30°C temperature!)...sor; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00094.html (10,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]