Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Rugby\s+Loran\s+QRV\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Rugby\s+Loran\s+QRV\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Rugby Loran QRV (score: 1): Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:49:02 +0100; Hi All, After reading the mail at mid-day today (22/06/2005) reference LORAN transmissions from Rugby I carried out some checks. Using my G3LNP loop & Spec Lab I compared noise levels with previous S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00101.html (9,845 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Rugby Loran QRV (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:05:52 EDT; With the introduction of any new system there will be an evaluation of its success and an assessment of the positive and negative aspects of its operation. I certainly think its worth a letter to 1); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00102.html (9,693 bytes)
3. LF: RE: Rugby Loran QRV (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:01:44 +0100; Dear LF Group, The Rugby Loran seems to have gone away again for the time being... Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-06/msg00107.html (8,435 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]