Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Ready\s+for\s+JT9\s+in\s+MF\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:39:09 +0000
Sorry Rik, no copy here :-( May be it is too early. I will keep calling and listening untill 23 utc aprox WSPR after that. Zzzz mode ;-) 73 de Luis EA5DOM De: [email protected] [owne
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00157.html (14,747 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:26:19 +0000
Hi Luis, you were also called by DG3LV and ON5TA. Your signal was audible most of the time, would have been OK in CW. At the moment I am using a temporary antenna, only 8m high, and about 100W output
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00161.html (16,022 bytes)

3. LF: RE: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:54:02 +0000
Hi Rik Pity ! Could not receive anybody here. And conditions were not bad at all. I was spotting LA2XPA in WPSR at that time I have been monitoring JT9 for some time now and can recall receiving you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00162.html (17,832 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: Vincent Stallbaum <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:00:21 +0100
Hello Luis, I fired up my PA on my last transmission last weekend. The samller PA is probably too weak to reach you :( Hope too catch you soon! vy73 Vinny Am 22.03.2017 um 08:26 schrieb Rik Strobbe:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00163.html (22,837 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:13:47 +0000
Hello Luis, maybe your big building is good for transmitting but not so good for receiving due to all the local noise. Setting up a remote RX at a quiet location could do miracles. In JT9-1 mode sign
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00165.html (19,027 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:22:54 +0100
...i would have another explanation :-) 73, Stefan Am 22.03.2017 10:13, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hello Luis, maybe your big building is good for transmitting but not so good for receiving due to all the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00166.html (14,085 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:39:52 +0000
&#8203;and that would be? 73, Rik Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens DK7FC <[email protected]> Verzonden: woensdag 22 maart 2017 10:22 Aan: rsgb_
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00167.html (14,367 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:00:51 +0100
Hm, i remember from my LF days that people tend to say i have "no ears" when i didn't copy them. They copied me very good and so their easy conclusion was that obviously i do not receive well. Actual
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00170.html (17,465 bytes)

9. RE: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:15:08 +0000
Hi Rik, Stefan. Interesting discussion :-) Yes. The problem here is worse, as I'm further away from the center of activity (central EU) and so better Tx is needed to reach here. last night conditions
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00171.html (20,036 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:57:16 +0100
Hi Luis, Am 22.03.2017 11:15, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fern&aacute;ndez: How far away from my QTH can I use an SDR for Rx in a quite site and still consider it real 2 way QSO ? This is a "Pandora box" p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00173.html (12,736 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:18:58 +0000
Hi Stefan, I am afraid I touched a sensitive spot ;-) I can only ensure you that is certainly not my intention to blame anyone. I have done some WSPRing last winter and below 2000km distance propagat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00174.html (17,844 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:23:15 +0000
Hello Luis, I would't care about that 7km, that's little more than 10 wavelengths ;-) Also compared to the distance between us (about 1500km) it can be neglected. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-rsgb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00175.html (20,641 bytes)

13. RE: LF: Re: Ready for JT9 in MF (score: 1)
Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:38:00 +0000
Hi Stefan, MF Is your remote location using a GHz link to your shack or do you cover the distance via internet? In other words, is it completely your own infrastructure that you are using or are thir
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00178.html (13,223 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu