Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Testing\s+WSPR\-15\s+on\s+630m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Testing\s+WSPR\-15\s+on\s+630m\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:13:31 +0100; Hi Victor, Thanks. I've just done some CW QSOs with the new FETs, with DF5QG, G3KEV, G3XIZ, DK6SX/p and DD7PC :-) Now in this moment the first WSPR-15 transmission is running. The PA's dimensions are; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00002.html (13,282 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:26:58 +0100; Hi Victor, Thanks for the feedback. Yes i see i'm drifting. Not so fine. There were some missing decodes. Must have been due to the timing or maybe the drift? My TX converter is quite an ugly constru; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00003.html (12,208 bytes)
3. RE: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:59:08 +0100; HI Stefan, glad to see your signal again,very strong in Utrecht.More stations are watching wspr15,just keep it cool,who knows wat happens, 73 gl victor --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: owner-rsgb_lf_g; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00058.html (19,432 bytes)
4. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:59:32 +0100; 70MHz = 4 Meter Band http://www.70mhz.org/ Hi Victor, That's not ugly at all :-) Looks like a lot of effort! 70 MHz, is that the LO for a MF mixer? 73, Stefan Am 05.02.2013 16:57, schrieb victor13@on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00084.html (13,266 bytes)
5. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:17:56 +0100; Hi Victor, MF, There was something wrong again last night. The last decodes were from 0:30 UTC. I reduced the drift significantly by using the fan. It should be no problem for WSPR-15 that way. I als; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00111.html (12,948 bytes)
6. RE: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:04:01 +0100; Hi Stefan, your signal on the waterfall Victor Attachment: dk7fcwspr15.JPG Description: JPEG image; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00281.html (11,372 bytes)
7. RE: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:57:28 +0100; Hello Stefan, picture of a ugly 70MHz treansverter,lots of glue and solder but it works very well. Spurious sgnals more than 100 dB down,except harmonics,just 70db down. 73 Victor --Oorspronkelijk be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00285.html (11,941 bytes)
8. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:22:50 +0100; Victor, MF, Yes, there are some stations watching: 2013-02-04 20:00 DK7FC 0.475071 +1 -2 JN49ik 1 PA3FNY JO22nc 389 321 2013-02-04 20:00 DK7FC 0.475821 -5 -1 JN49ik 1 IK1WVQ JN44cb 599 184 2013-02-04; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00301.html (18,659 bytes)
9. RE: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:42:03 +0100; Could be,but no, just another band to play during daytime, 73 Victor --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Namens Stefan Schäfe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00378.html (12,777 bytes)
10. LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:55:29 +0100; Good luck with your repairs Stefan,I am on the air at 1605Hz audio 25% Hope the fets will last! 73 Victor --Oorspronkelijk bericht-- Van: [email protected] [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_grou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00501.html (11,824 bytes)
11. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: "Victor van Kooten" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:40:57 +0100; Hello Stefan, I don't know how sensitive wspr15 is for drift,maybe this is a cause for lost decodes.Maybe you can change the xtal osc for a tcxo or a ocxo,they are very cheap these days,ofcourse it d; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00570.html (11,482 bytes)
12. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 23:58:09 +0100; Maybe another fan helps https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DSC04518.JPG ;-) 73, Stefan Am 04.02.2013 22:04, schrieb [email protected]: Hi Stefan, your signal on the waterfall Victor; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00619.html (11,071 bytes)
13. Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:51:12 +0100; Hi Victor, That's not ugly at all :-) Looks like a lot of effort! 70 MHz, is that the LO for a MF mixer? 73, Stefan Am 05.02.2013 16:57, schrieb [email protected]: Hello Stefan, picture of a ugly 70; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00736.html (12,887 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]