Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+RA1792\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Pick" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 16:46:30 +0100
Alberto I don't know about the price but I wasn't too impressed with the receiver when I used Graham's (G3XTZ) on 136 at the HF convention. Sensitivity and stability aren't a problem (they have a nic
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00195.html (10,473 bytes)

2. LF: RE: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 22:37:07 +0200
Dave, Laurie and Tracey, thanks indeed for your considerations about the RA1792. I had thought it were indeed a "premium receiver", as owning it qualifies you for membership in the premium-receivers
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00198.html (9,816 bytes)

3. LF: RE: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:10:41 +0200
I would add: quite easy to maintain, no custom ICs, only a few outdated parts but still available on the market. The synthesizer is remarkably performant, and the 3rd order IMD is in the 102-103 dB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00205.html (11,262 bytes)

4. Re: LF: RE: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:04:22 +0200 (CEST)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00206.html (11,064 bytes)

5. LF: Re: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: "Andy" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:00:09 +0100
I used an RA1792 for all my narrow band LF work, and it was performed admirably. The PLL synthesizers appear to have good phase noise performance, and they can be used down to 8kHz - at which point y
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00208.html (16,102 bytes)

6. LF: RE: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: "james moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:05:33 +0100
Dear Alberto, Here are some further comparisons (bearing in mind I don&#8217;t own a R75!): The RA1792 has flat sensitivity from about 100kHz &#8211; 30MHz (about 0.3uV for 12dB SNR in SSB bandwidth)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00209.html (14,977 bytes)

7. LF: Re: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:01:01 +0200
Andy, Brian, Jim, Laurie, Alan and Walter what else can I say besides Thank You ! You all gave me a lot of material to think about and upon which to make my decision. I like very much the feature of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00211.html (10,463 bytes)

8. LF: RE: RA1792 (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:16:43 +0200
Alberto I know you are waiting for my opinion about this RX. I would not buy this old technology with degraded components at the prices that suppliers are asking both in the UK and other parts of EU
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00212.html (11,121 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu