Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+QRSS\s+on\s+MF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+QRSS\s+on\s+MF\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: QRSS on MF (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 15:30:46 +0000; Hi Stefan, all, around 476.18 kHz (let's say 476.1-476.3 kHz) seems very convenient for QRSS, for the reasons you already mentioned. I thought this was already the de facto QRSS band segment. 73, Rik; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00080.html (23,389 bytes)
2. LF: RE: QRSS on MF (score: 1): Author: "F6CNI - Andy - JN19QB" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:58:33 +0100; HI all. I think also the 476.2 kHz +/- 0.1 kHz band segment is the best choice, and also it is on use for a long time with success ! It is not necessary to change that... 73 de Andy. From: rik.strobb; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00081.html (23,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]