Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+OPERA\s+and\s+QRS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: OPERA and QRS (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:27:55 +0000
Hello Rik Thanks again for your thoughts. I don't usually disagree much with what you say.:-) Your extreme example of 20WPM for 4mins is totally unfair to Morse, due to exactly the same reason, you c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00128.html (14,450 bytes)

2. RE: LF: RE: OPERA and QRS (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:40:09 +0100
Hello Eddy, Opera (and WSPR) are using the best way to improve SNR, in their case FEC. For QRSS using a shorter dotlength and repeating the message (what is in fact and kind of FEC) is probably not t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00265.html (14,324 bytes)

3. Re: LF: RE: OPERA and QRS (score: 1)
Author: qrss <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:06:51 +0000
Hello Rik I am glad you used the word fair, I have been trying to avoid it. my first though when viewing my TX sending QRS3, then OPERA was, and is every time I look, this is not fair. Yes digital mo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00589.html (11,971 bytes)

4. LF: RE: OPERA and QRS (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:52:30 +0100
Hello Eddy, comparing Opera and QRSS with identical bit lengths seems not correct to me as Opera uses "ticks" (such as Forward Error Correction) to improve SNR. Assuming a simple 8 bit character set
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00720.html (11,236 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu