Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+M0BMU\s+mods\s+for\s+G0MRF\s+300\s+W\s+Tx\s+is\s+this\s+a\s+gap\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+M0BMU\s+mods\s+for\s+G0MRF\s+300\s+W\s+Tx\s+is\s+this\s+a\s+gap\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: M0BMU mods for G0MRF 300 W Tx is this a gap? (score: 1): Author: "Hans-Albrecht Haffa" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:34:05 +0100; Hello Lowfers, yes it is a gap. A residuous gap of two core halves with lapped surfaces is still a gap. It will reduce relative permeability and remanent flux. It is better to use core halves with a; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00164.html (9,876 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]