Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Feeding\s+grounded\s+tower\s+on\s+136KHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Feeding\s+grounded\s+tower\s+on\s+136KHz\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Feeding grounded tower on 136KHz (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:43:52 +0100; Dear Geoff, I think Rik is right about shunt-feeding the tower being extremely inefficient. The further up the tower the shunt feed is connected, the better it will be, but even if the connection is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00105.html (10,363 bytes)
2. LF: RE: Feeding grounded tower on 136KHz (score: 1): Author: Geoff <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 12:49:30 +0300; Thankyou to M0BMU, RU6LA and ON7YD for your replies, which have provided me with enough information to dismiss shunt feeding. I have a sling shot which I can loop over an outcrop on the structure at; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00108.html (8,956 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Feeding grounded tower on 136KHz (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:51:49 +0100; Dear Mike, LF group, I think the feed point impedance of the shunt-fed mast will be a fairly low inductance in series with a loss resistance of a few ohms due to the feed wire and mast - essentially; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00126.html (9,478 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]