Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+DK7FC\s+in\s+Todmorden\s+at\s+2970\s+Hz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:04:27 -0400
Paul, Does this meet the criterion that you were thinking of in your comments March 21st and March 22nd? 73, Jim AA5BW Stefan wrote (10th March): After coherently stacking 13:00 to 00:00 for 9 days i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00202.html (11,797 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:14:43 +0000
Exceeds. About 5 sigma, exactly the right frequency, roughly the correct bearing, E and H with the expected relative phase, even the E/H ratio is about right for a distant signal (as opposed to loca
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00203.html (11,082 bytes)

3. RE: LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:52:12 -0400
Congratulations! Seems like more than a record. Seems historic. Hard to imagine a tougher frequency range than the neighborhood of 2970 Hz. 2970 Hz at 140 km, 303 km, 502 km and 881 km even defy mode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00207.html (12,057 bytes)

4. RE: LF: RE: DK7FC in Todmorden at 2970 Hz (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:08:45 -0400
Hello Paul and Stefan, I thought it would be interesting as a guide for future testing to know if path loss at 2970 Hz 100km 1000km (a mode-sensitive combination with no validated models) is closer t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-03/msg00215.html (13,103 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu