Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RADCOM\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Steve McDonald" <>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:56:37 -0700
...you mean that your getting tired of the "How To Build a Dipole" and the "You Too Can Have a Shack-On-Your-Back" article every month?? Steve / VE7SL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00053.html (9,332 bytes)

2. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:03:47 -0400
And dont forget the latest version of the J pole for working those repeaters HAR Bob K3DJC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00062.html (9,470 bytes)

3. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Jean-L. RAULT" <>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:13:21 +0100
Johan H. Bodin a écrit : < <snip> The swedish ham magazine QTC seems to be following the same trend. Technical articles are beeing replaced by mega-multi-button advertisments and quantity seems to go
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00077.html (12,110 bytes)

4. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Johan H. Bodin" <>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:01:27 +0100
I'm sorry Chris, I was a bit angry but I did not intend to upset anyone. Anyway, these ad's are driving me mad... Isn't it possible to at least put them all at the end of the magazine? ;-) To Dave ZL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00103.html (12,970 bytes)

5. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Johan H. Bodin" <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:35:49 +0100
John, LF, you may wish to have a look at QEX, http://www.arrl.org/qex/ If you accept a paperless forum, there is a Yahoo group called EMRFD at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emrfd/ . It was started by
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00112.html (11,553 bytes)

6. LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "lawrence mayhead" <>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:51:05 +0000
Actually I would simply like to see a copy of Radcom ! 73 Laurie G3AQC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00160.html (10,211 bytes)

7. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: John GM4SLV <>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:21:33 +0100
Hi Mal I got mine yesterday, all the way up here. In the same delivery was this month's QST and on Monday this quarter's SPRAT. Too much to read, so little time! Cheers, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00162.html (9,254 bytes)

8. RE: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Trayner" <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:40:53 +0100
Dear Johan, Thanks once again for your contribution. Please don't apologise - you certainly didn't upset me :-) Actually, as editor of a small scientific journal, you wrote exactly the sort of email
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00168.html (11,594 bytes)

9. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:39:16 -0400
Hi Andy Bob K3DJC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00177.html (9,332 bytes)

10. RE: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "John W Gould" <>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:18:07 +0100
As RSGB HF Manager I would be more than happy to support technical articles concerning 500kHz or indeed 136kHz. Technical articles are peer reviewed prior to publication and support from someone like
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00191.html (10,538 bytes)

11. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:27:33 +0100
Dear Johan, Thank you for your email. orgy! ... I don't want to pay for these ad's anymore... Forgive me for pointing it out, but you're not paying for the ads. Magazines take paid advertising to mak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00195.html (12,753 bytes)

12. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:34:29 EDT
John, I get the feeling that the 4 pages of "how to fit a PL-259" are probably most avidly read by the ops who need to know how much work their more knowledgable mate had to do in order to assess whe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00196.html (8,939 bytes)

13. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "John RABSON" <>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:07:32 +0100
But somebody still has to get people to provide copy, edit it (not just change the layout to conform to the house style - there can be much more to it than that). You also have to arrange for printin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00244.html (11,360 bytes)

14. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:43:29 +0100
I am sure this is drifting way way off topic for this reflector. Just to throw the cat in the fire, I thought this month's RadCom (when I finally received it) was considerably above average. The 3B7C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00258.html (11,643 bytes)

15. RE: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Chris Trayner" <>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:57:06 +0100
Dear Johan, Thank you for your email. orgy! ... I don't want to pay for these ad's anymore... Forgive me for pointing it out, but you're not paying for the ads. Magazines take paid advertising to mak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00295.html (11,705 bytes)

16. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Johan H. Bodin" <>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:42:36 +0200
Hi, I have been an RSGB member for quite a few years now and I agree with most of you that "Radcomic" is becoming too much of an advertisment orgy! The number of full-page ad's for multi-button appli
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00319.html (11,529 bytes)

17. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:38:33 +0000
Don't be put off by the need for house styles etc - if you do look at the articles that have made it in the past, they were all in the authors own words. The peer review is more or less a rubber stam
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00342.html (15,155 bytes)

18. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: Piotr Mynarski <>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:08:19 +0200
The future of amateur radio may already be behind us. :-( 73 Johan SM6LKM Hi Johan, LF i am afraid that the problem of technical info in our hobby magazines is only a tiny fraction of a far more dang
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00343.html (12,107 bytes)

19. Re: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:02:21 -0400
I've also noticed the trend, my renewal came up a couple of weeks ago and i agonised as to whether it was still worth having. I decided to continue ONLY to support the RSGB for what it does for us in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00352.html (10,938 bytes)

20. RE: LF: RADCOM (score: 1)
Author: Reeves Paul <>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:33:12 +0100
How about the strange new appearances? I was intrigued by 'Radio Sports' and had visions of pole vaulting with 136KHz verticals, throwing the FT817 and weight lifting with the R-390. But no, just mor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-10/msg00358.html (11,486 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu