Johan H. Bodin a écrit : < <snip> The swedish ham magazine QTC seems to be following the same trend. Technical articles are beeing replaced by mega-multi-button advertisments and quantity seems to go
I'm sorry Chris, I was a bit angry but I did not intend to upset anyone. Anyway, these ad's are driving me mad... Isn't it possible to at least put them all at the end of the magazine? ;-) To Dave ZL
John, LF, you may wish to have a look at QEX, http://www.arrl.org/qex/ If you accept a paperless forum, there is a Yahoo group called EMRFD at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emrfd/ . It was started by
Hi Mal I got mine yesterday, all the way up here. In the same delivery was this month's QST and on Monday this quarter's SPRAT. Too much to read, so little time! Cheers, John
Dear Johan, Thanks once again for your contribution. Please don't apologise - you certainly didn't upset me :-) Actually, as editor of a small scientific journal, you wrote exactly the sort of email
As RSGB HF Manager I would be more than happy to support technical articles concerning 500kHz or indeed 136kHz. Technical articles are peer reviewed prior to publication and support from someone like
Dear Johan, Thank you for your email. orgy! ... I don't want to pay for these ad's anymore... Forgive me for pointing it out, but you're not paying for the ads. Magazines take paid advertising to mak
John, I get the feeling that the 4 pages of "how to fit a PL-259" are probably most avidly read by the ops who need to know how much work their more knowledgable mate had to do in order to assess whe
But somebody still has to get people to provide copy, edit it (not just change the layout to conform to the house style - there can be much more to it than that). You also have to arrange for printin
I am sure this is drifting way way off topic for this reflector. Just to throw the cat in the fire, I thought this month's RadCom (when I finally received it) was considerably above average. The 3B7C
Dear Johan, Thank you for your email. orgy! ... I don't want to pay for these ad's anymore... Forgive me for pointing it out, but you're not paying for the ads. Magazines take paid advertising to mak
Hi, I have been an RSGB member for quite a few years now and I agree with most of you that "Radcomic" is becoming too much of an advertisment orgy! The number of full-page ad's for multi-button appli
Don't be put off by the need for house styles etc - if you do look at the articles that have made it in the past, they were all in the authors own words. The peer review is more or less a rubber stam
The future of amateur radio may already be behind us. :-( 73 Johan SM6LKM Hi Johan, LF i am afraid that the problem of technical info in our hobby magazines is only a tiny fraction of a far more dang
I've also noticed the trend, my renewal came up a couple of weeks ago and i agonised as to whether it was still worth having. I decided to continue ONLY to support the RSGB for what it does for us in
How about the strange new appearances? I was intrigued by 'Radio Sports' and had visions of pole vaulting with 136KHz verticals, throwing the FT817 and weight lifting with the R-390. But no, just mor
