Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+QRP\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:55:56 +0100
Absolutely CORRECT Mal, I totally agree. Chris, G4AYT.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-06/msg00043.html (10,101 bytes)

2. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:30:04 -0400
Mal wrote: >It is difficult enough to be heard/seen with 1W erp on LF never mind QRP. >QRP on LF is a waste of time for those wishing to be heard outside their >own back yard using an elevated antenn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-08/msg00007.html (11,603 bytes)

3. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:08:22 +0100
It is difficult enough to be heard/seen with 1W erp on LF never mind QRP. QRP on LF is a waste of time for those wishing to be heard outside their own back yard using an elevated antenna. A grounded
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-08/msg00200.html (11,323 bytes)

4. LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:32:27 +0100
It is difficult enough to be heard/seen with 1W erp on LF never mind QRP. QRP on LF is a waste of time for those wishing to be heard outside their own back yard using an elevated antenna. A grounded
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-08/msg00269.html (8,911 bytes)

5. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:06:20 +0100
Hi Mal, LFers, I beg to differ.  My LowFER beacon on 188.830 kHz. has been copied solid at over 1200 miles!  Not bad for 1 WATT D.C. INPUT into a "T" antenna and using QRSS30 mode!  73, J.B., VE3EAR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-08/msg00399.html (13,100 bytes)

6. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Claudio Pozzi <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 19:17:08 +0200
About 250 km not scheduled QRSS3 QSO. IK4JSJ's Tx was a TDA2002, 3 watt. Fine signal. 73 Claudio, IK2PII -- Claudio Pozzi - Happy Linux User - http://www.qsl.net/ik2pii Attachment: ik4jsj-3w.jpg Desc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-08/msg00643.html (10,231 bytes)

7. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:10:03 +0200
Righto Mal - so when will we finally see a decent 9 kHz signal from that famous Scarborough antenna? 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: [email protected] mal hamilton Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:28 PM
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00037.html (9,762 bytes)

8. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:56:38 +0100
Markus I have made it quite clear that presently I am not interested in Transmitting on 9 khz and if I did you would certainly hear me. I am told that I have the strongest signal on 137 and 500 khz f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00084.html (11,455 bytes)

9. LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:28:05 +0100
Why do some insist on flogging QRP on the LF bands. The object should be to generate a signal that all can hear or see. QRO is more appropriate on the lower frequencies otherwise the RX operator has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00169.html (8,760 bytes)

10. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:13:27 +0100
I agree Pete. Mal's signal would be a very welcome one on 8.97kHz and the thing preventing many of us VLF enthusiasts from TXing (other than by earth mode) is lack of space for a credible antenna. Ma
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00171.html (15,638 bytes)

11. RE: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL7UK <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:23:41 -0800
Or a wideband view of what you can see at VLF... :-) ...... Righto Mal - so when will we finally see a decent 9 kHz signal from that famous Scarborough antenna? 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: g3kevmal@talk
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00338.html (10,299 bytes)

12. Re: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:55:51 +0100 (BST)
Hi Mal and LF Too bad Mal you have a good set up to radiate on 9kc/s to help the interest in this part of the spectrum. Most can not TX on that band because they just do not have the space with an ex
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-04/msg00541.html (14,141 bytes)

13. RE: LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:42:06 +0100
About this time last year I seem to remember sending some narrow bandwidth SMT Hell sigs at powers of a Watt or so. With the QRP discussion going on recently, is anyone interested if I set up this be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00259.html (8,718 bytes)

14. LF: QRP (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:23:29 +0100
With Ron's (G6RO) recent success with 5w on qrp maybe the time has come to allocate a spot frequency for qrp activity. I have noticed that Ron has been calling cq on top of other qso' a number of tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00203.html (8,010 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu