Dear LF Group, This weekend, I am hoping to make another expedition to the Puckeridge Decca station, which has been made available again through the good offices of G3JKV and the Crawley club. The ma
There has been some vigorous debate lately about the advantages and disadvantages of big and small antennas, with some holding the view that big antennas have superior radiation patterns to small one
Dear LF Group, This weekend, I am hoping to make another expedition to the Puckeridge Decca station, which has been made available again through the good offices of G3JKV and the Crawley club. The m
James Moritz wrote: snip The main motive for this expedition is to do some back-to-back comparisons between a big antenna (the 100m Decca mast) and a small, amateur-type antenna (an inverted L about
On 17/05/00 G3KEV wrote: To my knowledge no one in the past has disputed that a large and small vertical would have the same radiation PATTERN. What has been said is that the intensity of the signal
How will you be determining effective radiated power? Isn't ERP pretty much _defined_ in terms of field strength? 73, John KD4IDY Of course. But the reason for doing such experiments is that, believe
Dummy load is the significant part of this statement because some low antennas including yours are but dummy loads. I am happy that you are saving a file of my observations. I kill all messages when
You can't win Rik! Hi! John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp
G'day Rik, including yours are but dummy loads. I am happy that you are saving a file of my observations. I kill all messages when read, Well that answer my questions! Confused, inconsistent posts wh