Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Puckeridge\s+Decca\s+station\s+\-\s+Big\s+\&\s+small\s+antennas\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 12:36:28 +0000
Dear LF Group, This weekend, I am hoping to make another expedition to the Puckeridge Decca station, which has been made available again through the good offices of G3JKV and the Crawley club. The ma
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00242.html (11,943 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 13:32:23 EDT
There has been some vigorous debate lately about the advantages and disadvantages of big and small antennas, with some holding the view that big antennas have superior radiation patterns to small one
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00249.html (10,426 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 18:33:15 +0000
Dear LF Group, This weekend, I am hoping to make another expedition to the Puckeridge Decca station, which has been made available again through the good offices of G3JKV and the Crawley club. The m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00251.html (13,201 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:31:13 +1200
James Moritz wrote: snip The main motive for this expedition is to do some back-to-back comparisons between a big antenna (the 100m Decca mast) and a small, amateur-type antenna (an inverted L about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00252.html (10,839 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:33:17
On 17/05/00 G3KEV wrote: To my knowledge no one in the past has disputed that a large and small vertical would have the same radiation PATTERN. What has been said is that the intensity of the signal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00256.html (10,625 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 09:35:24 +0100
How will you be determining effective radiated power? Isn't ERP pretty much _defined_ in terms of field strength? 73, John KD4IDY Of course. But the reason for doing such experiments is that, believe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00257.html (10,142 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 16:37:08 +0000
Dummy load is the significant part of this statement because some low antennas including yours are but dummy loads. I am happy that you are saving a file of my observations. I kill all messages when
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00267.html (11,363 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 13:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
You can't win Rik! Hi! John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00273.html (9,316 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Puckeridge Decca station - Big & small antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 06:22:55 +1000
G'day Rik, including yours are but dummy loads. I am happy that you are saving a file of my observations. I kill all messages when read, Well that answer my questions! Confused, inconsistent posts wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00275.html (12,840 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu