-- Original Message -- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" <[email protected]> BTW it is incredible that nowadays people in north america are using sophisticated receive setups with FFT to barely receive SAQ,
LF It now takes hundreds of watts to be observed or heard around EU on 137 Khz whereas some years back less than 200 watts achieved a good result like a QSO on CW. The 130 watt Ropex used by many res
Mal, LF, Am 02.08.2011 22:49, schrieb Chris Trayner: Perhaps some of the grabber operators would like to reply with their hints and kinks - personally I'm ignorant of how they run these things. 73, C
LF Well it seems some are of the opinion that the problem is not Antennas but increased environmental noise and Seasonal conditions. Others say that a small antenna for RX es Grabbers is better than
Hi Mal and others, It would be interesting to know if their reports of other Txs have changed over the same time. In other words, is it a change in their sensitivity (whether due to Ae change, pre-am
Don't discount the increased interference from [...] exactly. i don't have much experience with lf, but i see a big deterioration of the noise floor at vlf. in december 2006 i could receive SAQ from
Warren I do not have a problem. I can see es hear them all but I am disappointed how weak my signal looks on some of the EU grabbers compared to yester years and some cannot hear me when I call for a
Mal, Most grabbers do not use the main antenna, I have only one main antenna for LF & MF so the grabber uses an active antenna which has got to be better than none, therefore no grabber. 73 Gary - G4
Mal, Don't discount the increased interference from switching power supplies, plasma televisions, PLTs and the like. Everyone is battling a higher noise floor these days. My suggestion: get a sail bo
