Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Optimal\s+width\s+for\s+LF\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "Petr Maly" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:34:08 +0200
Hello all I am just designing a new RX for 136 kHz band. It will have IF on 1 MHz with high quality x-tal filter with bandwidth 200 Hz. The main selectivity will by obtained on AF with passive filter
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00155.html (9,450 bytes)

2. LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:26:10 -0400
Petr asked: What bandwidth do you use and what is the experience?< I use 100 Hz bandwidth for normal CW as well as for Slow CW. I use the 100 Hz filter of my MV62 level meter, which is a 200 kHz mech
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00160.html (10,813 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "Andre' Kesteloot" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 16:24:37 -0400
Hello all I am just designing a new RX for 136 kHz band. It will have IF on 1 MHz with high quality x-tal filter with bandwidth 200 Hz. The main selectivity will by obtained on AF with passive filte
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00165.html (10,159 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 11:32:00 +0200
To All from PA0SE Narrow bandwidth filters do not have to ring provided they are of the phase-linear type (constant group delay in the passband). I use a home made passive phase-linear filter with a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00173.html (12,577 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 09:19:47 +1200
I use a home made passive phase-linear filter with a bandwidth of 30Hz and centre frequency of 1000Hz. It can pass up to 24 wpm without trouble (unfortunately the operator can't ...) The filter has f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00179.html (10,743 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "C Andersson" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 09:48:39 +0200
Could you post a brief text summary of your design? 73, Bob ZL2CA PA0LQ filter descriptions: http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/af_filter.htm http://home5.swipnet.se/~w-54761/pa0lq_filter.htm 73 Ch
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00182.html (9,610 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "Cliff Buttschardt" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:57:26 +0000
Christer and the group. I was delighted to get the two URL's containing the 30 Hz filter and noise blanker. You might remember some years ago the "HDO" phase linear filter. That was when I was W6HDO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00209.html (10,285 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Optimal width for LF? (score: 1)
Author: "Clifford Buttschardt" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Further update on the filters mentioned below. I am convinced that any filter has enough tolerance variations that experimental "tweeking" is necessary for minimum ringing. Most of us are using 800 h
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00377.html (11,300 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu