Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+No\s+US\s+Ham\s+Band\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+No\s+US\s+Ham\s+Band\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Laurence J Howell" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 09:55:02 -0800; ...and I had soldered in the last of the FETS too...Laurence KL1X; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00052.html (8,691 bytes)
2. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Denis Cote" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 17:25:43 -0400; This Blows! John Here lately, it seems, we have a "repressive" democracy... Jay Rusgrove Jay Rusgrove, W1VD [email protected] wrote: collapse of a nicest last; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00071.html (11,279 bytes)
3. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 08:00:40 -0400; John Here lately, it seems, we have a "repressive" democracy... Jay Rusgrove Jay Rusgrove, W1VD << Obviously more and more of some government's decisions are directly influenced by the power of indus; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00072.html (10,191 bytes)
4. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 01:58:53 EDT; << well, John, we have the best politicians, money can buy! >> Or rent. :-) John; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00074.html (8,745 bytes)
5. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 06:05:24 +0200; Hello John, time I read the Constitution, I could swear our form of government was representative democracy." ... well, John, we have the best politicians, money can buy! 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00075.html (9,383 bytes)
6. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 16:50:39 EDT; << Obviously more and more of some government's decisions are directly influenced by the power of industries and large companies! >> It reminds me of a time several years ago, Geri, when a reporter o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00076.html (9,744 bytes)
7. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:49:31 +0100; Dear John, LF group, Lowfers Very sorry to hear about the FCC's absurd decision. The ARRL report reads:- against the greater public interest of an interference-free power grid." Have they got this t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00077.html (10,930 bytes)
8. RE: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Ashlock,William" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:41:44 -0400; Despite assurance from ARRL that an amateur would have to be within a few 100 yards of the line for there to be any problem, at which distance the power line QRM would be horrendous, FCC have gone al; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00079.html (10,761 bytes)
9. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:34:26 +0100; against the greater public interest of an interference-free power grid." Have they got this the right way round? Virtually all radio services on LF suffer a continual and steadily increasing amount; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00081.html (11,796 bytes)
10. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:17:30 -0400; Dear LF-Folks, I am very disappointed about this FCC-decision. Obviously more and more of some government's decisions are directly influenced by the power of industries and large companies! 73 Geri,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00082.html (9,094 bytes)
11. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "Hugh M0WYE" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:01:27 +0100; Hi Jim, et al, Also sorry to hear about no LF band for US. an allocation to the amateur service could result in the need for PLCs to modify or cease their >operations to avoid causing interference to; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00083.html (10,964 bytes)
12. Re: LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 12:27:01 +0100; Dear John, LF group, Lowfers Very sorry to hear about the FCC's absurd decision. The ARRL report reads:- against the greater public interest of an interference-free power grid." Have they got this th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00085.html (9,812 bytes)
13. LF: No US Ham Band (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:18:45 EDT; Sorry, doesn't look like we'll be joining the rest of the world on LF any time soon. The Federal Communications Commission turned down a US ham band at 136kHz for the foreseeable future. There's a st; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-05/msg00087.html (8,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]