Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Needless\s+restrictions\s+re\s+\:\s+Trans\s+Atlantic\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:12:17 +0100
But "They" have an implicit duty to regulate only for some demonstrable universally desirable purpose...otherwise it descends to : "Don't do that !" "Why?" "Because We said so ,that's why" Examples :
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00192.html (13,139 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:04:15 EST
The people enforcing the rules are the very same "sybil serpents" who are employed to shuffle .........................etc. Somebody has to give them employment and if they wern't doing that we would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00199.html (9,201 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:29:07 EST
In a message dated 12/28/2004 1:12:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: But "They" have an implicit duty to regulate only for some demonstrable universally desirable purpose.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00202.html (13,829 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:31:31 +0100
I am all in favour of keeping amateur bands strictly amateur. (Don't start me on about Winlink for example). From what you say (which I did not previously know) a LF amateur band has been specificall
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00204.html (16,785 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:24:27 EST
In a message dated 12/29/2004 3:32:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: From what you say (which I did not previously know) a LF amateur band has been specifically denied in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00219.html (10,568 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:42:23 +0100
Thanks. I found that quite illuminating. How can the Power companies claim to be permitted to operate under part 15 rules [ antennas and feeder etc not to exceed 15 metres ] when their antenna system
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00220.html (12,289 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Needless restrictions re : Trans Atlantic (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:30:13 EST
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-12/msg00232.html (9,591 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu