Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+NA\s+\&\s+XIL\s+137kHz\s+\(QSY\s+136\.5\s+CW\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:45:24 -0230 (NDT)
Thanks to Joe Mike and Roelof who reported aural reception. Aural TA on 2200m is quite rare. I think the fastest was 5 wpm by Hartmut many years ago. The TX is on agan tonight down the band a bit on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00135.html (10,365 bytes)

2. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:26:46 +0200
Hello Joe, Good visual copy on 136.500 kHz. See attachment. The keying sidebands of your 10 WPM CW signal can be easily spotted. Marginal, if not very marginal aural copy. I will sent an audio clip i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00144.html (11,245 bytes)

3. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:30:09 +0200
Hello Joe, This is an audio clip taken at about 03.05 UTC. I wonder if you or anybody else can hear the Morse. The clip starts with <de>, but the first two letters of the call are corrupted. The seco
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00145.html (11,325 bytes)

4. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:10:26 -0230 (NDT)
Hi Roelof, This is very impressive! Amazing -- the first TA LF copy of 10 wpm from this station. I'll try for a few more dB and try again tonight. 73 and thanks Joe VO1NA
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00148.html (10,593 bytes)

5. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:15:04 +0200
Hello Joe, Excellent! I will see what I can squeeze out of my recording tomorrow. The credits should go to the incredible weak signal capabilities of Linrad! The receiver used is a relative low cost
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00149.html (10,678 bytes)

6. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:47:18 +0200
Hi all, the other message with attached images didn't arrived yet, so in this e-mail link to the captures of Joe's signals https://www.dropbox.com/s/o8lhx5wl9svu15p/capt12.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00150.html (14,634 bytes)

7. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:55:16 +0200
Hello Joe, Due to static, only partial aural copy. However, again excellent visual copy at dawn. 73, Roelof, pa0rdt The following section of this message contains a file attachment prepared for trans
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00159.html (11,378 bytes)

8. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:53:23 +0200
Hello Joe, Far less static, but also far less propagation. The same is the case for NDB QYon 263 kHz from Sydney, Canada Nova Scotia, which was much weaker than the previous days. None the less good
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00181.html (11,495 bytes)

9. Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW) (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:23:55 -0230 (NDT)
Hi Roelof, Group. OK on the poor condx. The K index is 4 which I think is not especially favourable. DST has been creeping down too. Lets try again when the numbers improve. Many thanks for recent re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-04/msg00183.html (11,327 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu