Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+MY\s+first\s+WSPR\s+\-\s+by\s+ear\s+\;\)\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+MY\s+first\s+WSPR\s+\-\s+by\s+ear\s+\;\)\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:38:43 +0100; Ok Dennis, Yes I see what you are describing, the system has some randomness in the tx / rx windows , most stations will set the system to 33% tx , ie you send for 33% of a time period ..... the syst; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00299.html (14,204 bytes)
2. RE: LF: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1): Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:59:42 +0100; Hi Dennis It's more addictive than crack cocaine!! Every extra 10km or so is a real buzz. Beats ssb dx hands down. With best regards Jim Dr. James Cowburn E [email protected] "The information; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00458.html (12,879 bytes)
3. LF: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1): Author: "Dennis" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:45:31 +0200; Hi! My first ever WSPR receptions - by ear... :) Whoever it was, thanks for this experience! Anyway, here are your reports: 13.XI.2009 22:00:00Z - 22:01:55Z 503,9.. RST559 22:06:00Z - 22:07:55Z 503,9; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00487.html (10,420 bytes)
4. Re: LF: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:57 +0100; I have learnt, WSPR sounds like a slightly rough CW and is transmitted in 4min-blocks. <<<<< Dennis , That may not be wspr , wspr tx time is 120 seconds locked to the exact time , with the start time; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00614.html (13,113 bytes)
5. Re: LF: MY first WSPR - by ear ;) (score: 1): Author: "Dennis" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:54:02 +0200; Okay better to say: One cycle seemed to be 4min, divided into abt. 115sec TX and 125sec no TX, maybe RX? The beginning of the received transmissions were always well within half a second around even; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00858.html (11,192 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]