Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Loops\s+v\s+Verticals\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Michael J Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:28:15 +0100
Andy Yes, I am here, and 'loops v verticals' is a very good idea for a project. I am now formally retired from Academe, but ironically immediately have been asked back to continue some activities. An
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00129.html (14,544 bytes)

2. LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:26:21 +0100
For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for Receiving, little or large but the bigger the bet
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00146.html (9,220 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:00:46 -0400
Hmmmm broadcasters want omni coverage so a loop really wouldnt work in this application however for Amateur work they would appear to work quite well,, The proof is in the pudding where a TX at 1 wat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00151.html (11,262 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:05:06 -0500
Oh boy, wait until Bill reads this. Your in for a whipping Mal. Hi hi... 73's, Mike WE0H WD2XGI hamilton mal wrote: For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00156.html (10,806 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:03:40 +0000 (GMT)
For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for Receiving, little or large but the bigger the bet
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00160.html (10,718 bytes)

6. RE: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Andy <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:47:00 +0100
I view of the continuing arguments about this issue, is there anyone who knows, or knows someone, with the mathmatical understanding of antenna theory as well as the common sense, to come up with a p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00162.html (12,891 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Eric KD5UWL <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:46:23 -0500 (CDT)
For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine for Receiving, little or large but the bigger the be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00167.html (10,617 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:12:36 -0700
Seems Mal has forgotten the primary purpose behind amatuer radio 'self learning' NOT 'self promotion.' Thankfully we have many others are willing to share and help us new to the craft to learn and en
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00169.html (11,445 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:58:49 +0100
Where is Scarborough and what is it's prefix? G3GVB Seems Mal has forgotten the primary purpose behind amatuer radio 'self learning' NOT 'self promotion.' Thankfully we have many others are willing t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00172.html (13,056 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:55:12 EDT
The type of environment is an essential part of the equation and so results in different environments are particularly of interest. This is exactly the crux of the matter. Mathematically, for a give
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00174.html (10,607 bytes)

11. LF: Loops V Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:36:06 +0100
Hi All At least this topic has injected some interest into the LF scene. LF activity around Europe has virtually died, in fact at present it is a dead duck. My comparison between loops and verticals
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00176.html (10,952 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Loops v Verticals (score: 1)
Author: WE0H Mike <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:05:30 -0500
No YOU want coverage in all directions. All antennas have disadvantages. Chill out Mal. Prozaq does wonders for symtoms like this. LOL!!! Later, Mike WE0H hamilton mal wrote: -- Original Message -- F
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00177.html (14,568 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Loops V Verticals (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 18:03:00 EDT
Actually, Mal, 76 Amps (if that is the true figure) may be accomodated with good materials and equally good engineering practice. However, the argument then becomes a debate about economics and retur
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00178.html (10,546 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Loops V Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:51:15 +0100
Not a boring diatribe; it is well said. If a person is truly interested he will persevere [ when I was 16, the thought that little me ,in the attic of my fathers house in S.Wales, could at the press
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00179.html (12,050 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Loops V Verticals (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 19:02:56 EDT
Yes, well Brian, The "most of us" I should have identified, I agree, are those who have a soldering iron almost as close (closer?) than a microphone or key! However we mustn't be that politically cor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00180.html (9,049 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Loops V Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:31:45 -0700
If a person is truly interested he will persevere [ when I was 16, the thought that little me ,in the attic of my fathers house in S.Wales, could at the press of a key alter the potential between two
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00181.html (10,023 bytes)

17. LF: LOOPS V VERTICALS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:04:15 +0100
Hi All Vernal and Steve agree with my observations that a large vertical is a better RX antenna in a quiet environment. My location like theirs is out in the country and quiet and suitable for a vert
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00244.html (9,441 bytes)

18. LF: LOOPS V VERTICALS (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:51:01 +0100
Hi All Considering RX only some around EU are getting good results with DX reception using the small mini vertical and others seemingly using small loops. Of the two I wonder which is better. I expec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00364.html (11,277 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu