My question about linear amplifiers sparked some useful dialogue about eliminating the need for linears. If a new data mode is to be developed, it seems to me that two modes are needed. One for 'loca
My question about linear amplifiers sparked some useful dialogue about eliminating the need for linears. If a new data mode is to be developed, it seems to me that two modes are needed. One for 'loca
An LF 'RTTY type waveform' already exists - Jason ! 'Normal' RTTY, even at the narrowest shift / baud rate for any of the standard software, would be far to wide to be sociable on LF. Andy G4JNT As s
An LF 'RTTY type waveform' already exists - Jason ! 'Normal' RTTY, even at the narrowest shift / baud rate for any of the standard software, would be far to wide to be sociable on LF. Normal RTTY wo
And RTTY. And other digital modes. Of course, it's also MF rather than LF, where a transmitting antenna of a given size is eight times more efficient than at 2200m, and where there's only about a th
Hi All Sorry if this lengthy message is a bit controversial but I feel I ought to comment on some of Mal's statements: Normal RTTY would not be acceptable on LF this has been discussed many times bef
Hi All Sorry if this lengthy message is a bit controversial but I feel I ought to comment on some of Mal's statements: As a newcomer to the band (only 18 months of listening and reading the Reflecto
[ ... ] Most cannot use a keyboard and just fumble along, CW would be the easiest option [ ... ] It took me a year to learn CW to the test speed (12 words per minute). It took me less than a week to
Most cannot use a keyboard and just fumble along, CW would be the easiest option I agree. CW is clearly the best choice for word processing and it is ideal for writing computer programs. Who needs a
Johan Many years ago ! watched the first production run of a professional audio amplifier following the change from handwired assembly to pcb. As the "reject for rework" units piled up on the test be
"What?" said the boss. "QED mate, Quality Eats the Dust !" I've never heard it before. I was thinking about "quod erat demonstrandum" http://mathworld.wolfram.com/QED.html I will add "Quality Eats th
On Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:21 PM, Johan Bodin [SMTP:[email protected]] wrote: I agree. CW is clearly the best choice for word processing and it is ideal for writing computer programs. Who needs a
Most RTTY programs have a computere generated CW facility also. Morse-challenged operators could possibly use such ? Bryan G3GVB Normal RTTY would not be acceptable on LF this has been discussed many
