Stefan What loss ? Let me know when u want a QSO on cw 137. I have both LF and MF available for immediate QSO'S also xband for a qso if u like 73 de mal/g3kev Hi Mal, LF, That sounds good! So, you ca
Stefan I have a selection of antennas here. In use at present for TX 1/4wave inv L up over 100 feet high and the rest horizontal, can also be used for RX. RX antenna is a 40metre vertical loop resona
73s Roger G3XBM On 23 January 2010 14:26, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: AFAIK The is no 'simple guide' JT4x was never originally going to be one of Joe's supported modes, although
Obviously not reading recent postings about no decodes from others although the signals are visible, like I said these signals are not onljy visible with me but audible so why complicate matters, jus
I still see these data signals as a waste of time since had the carrier been keyed I could read them 100% without having to wait for the right circumstance to get a decode, no need for level 2 demodu
I have already had a CW QSO with you and your 1mW. You congratulated me on my good ears. I worked G7NKS with his mW tx this morning on CW for the second time although only S1 I copied all his informa
Having looked on the WSJT website there is little (no?) reference to JT4A in the help files. I assume it is similar to modes like JT6M which I have managed to receive in the past on 50MHz but never
I still see these data signals as a waste of time since had the carrier been keyed I could read them 100% without having to wait for the right circumstance to get a decode, no need for level 2 demod
Obviously not reading recent postings about no decodes from others although the signals are visible, like I said these signals are not onljy visible with me but audible so why complicate matters, ju
I also mentioned QRS which you conveniently forgot about. Why would I struggle with 1mW when I am permitted 10Watts G3KEV -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT_User_600.pdf http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/JT2_JT4.TXT Its still debatable
After posting that, I realised the JT4 PIC/DDS beacon code is designed for 100% duty cycle operation, viz JT4, CW + carrier, which is a bit antisocial (certainly the wide bandwidth CW bit). And more
There cannot be a time when JT4 or WSPR will be received and not QRS because the trace is always visible long before a data decode. There has never been a case of an INVISIBLE trace and a data decod
There cannot be a time when JT4 or WSPR will be received and not QRS because the trace is always visible long before a data decode. There has never been a case of an INVISIBLE trace and a data decode
AFAIK The is no 'simple guide' JT4x was never originally going to be one of Joe's supported modes, although after our extensive use on uWaves it certainly is now. JT65x was the more popular and d
Oh for goodness sake....!? Surely the point it is to find - and then extend - the limit? Otherwise you would just pick up the telephone or write a letter....
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT_User_600.pdf http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/JT2_JT4.TXT Its still debatable
