Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Heidelberg\s+remote\s+MF\s+receiver\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:39:46 +0200
Hi Stefan, it looks like signals are consistently better on your remote receiver, perhaps around 6 dB or something in that ballpark. So it seems that all your work is finally paying off! I'm looking
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00146.html (17,661 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:12:38 +0200
Hi Stefan, since last night your two receivers have been operating without interruption, allowing to compare results from your two grabbers. - WSPR: Last night, 21 of my low-power WSPR transmissions
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00148.html (21,743 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:19:06 +0200
Hi Markus, Thanks. Indeed, i actually saw you in the morning with "O" copy in the garden, while it was "T" copy in the city. Switching from the T antenna to the loop didn't rise your SNR (to that tim
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00149.html (14,036 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:26:54 +0200
Hello Markus, Most interesting, thanks! Let us use the strong QRN to check if SL does perform better if the SpecLab NB is used in front of WSPR. Ah i could use a 2nd instance for a 2nd instance of WS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00150.html (21,863 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: John Bruce McCreath <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 08:34:51 -0400
Hello Markus....is there a chance you could increase the font size of your postings? They are an interesting but difficult read for me with my senior's eyesight....thanks! 73, J.B., VE3EAR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00151.html (10,491 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:02:14 +0200
Stefan, just tried some more WSPR between 12:44 and 13 UT, but with the current intense QRN there's just no chance. In the morning, there were only sparse flashes (maybe 1 to 5 per WSPR sequence), wh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00152.html (23,148 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Heidelberg remote MF receiver (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:21:28 +0200
Hello Markus, Am 27.06.2015 14:12, schrieb Markus Vester: - WSPR: Last night, 21 of my low-power WSPR transmissions were decoded simultaneously by DK7FC/p and DK7FC. On average, the /p receiver had a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00153.html (12,877 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu