Hi Stefan, it looks like signals are consistently better on your remote receiver, perhaps around 6 dB or something in that ballpark. So it seems that all your work is finally paying off! I'm looking
Hi Stefan, since last night your two receivers have been operating without interruption, allowing to compare results from your two grabbers. - WSPR: Last night, 21 of my low-power WSPR transmissions
Hi Markus, Thanks. Indeed, i actually saw you in the morning with "O" copy in the garden, while it was "T" copy in the city. Switching from the T antenna to the loop didn't rise your SNR (to that tim
Hello Markus, Most interesting, thanks! Let us use the strong QRN to check if SL does perform better if the SpecLab NB is used in front of WSPR. Ah i could use a 2nd instance for a 2nd instance of WS
Hello Markus....is there a chance you could increase the font size of your postings? They are an interesting but difficult read for me with my senior's eyesight....thanks! 73, J.B., VE3EAR
Stefan, just tried some more WSPR between 12:44 and 13 UT, but with the current intense QRN there's just no chance. In the morning, there were only sparse flashes (maybe 1 to 5 per WSPR sequence), wh
Hello Markus, Am 27.06.2015 14:12, schrieb Markus Vester: - WSPR: Last night, 21 of my low-power WSPR transmissions were decoded simultaneously by DK7FC/p and DK7FC. On average, the /p receiver had a
