Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Hartmut\'s\s+Grabber\s+\-\-\s+QRP\s+TA\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:56:17 -0330 (NST)
Hello Hartmut and Group, Even with only 65 watts from the TX, strong QRSS100 signals were seen on Hartmut's grabber at 137.777 so the power was cut to <10 watts by reducing the drain voltage of the c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00154.html (11,138 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: Bob Raide <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:29:58 -0500
I was about to announce that I would be transmitting in the odd hour slots-start 15 minutes after till 30 mins after and agn 45 minutes after till top of the hour. Will that mess things up? Bob WE2XE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00399.html (15,647 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:53:13 +0100
Hello Joe, thank you for your kind words! Still struggling here with my local Pest DCF39. Between 03:15 and 04:40 UTC DCF39 was sending a higher pulse frequence. That is the reason of the higher nois
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00573.html (12,171 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:51:57 -0330 (NST)
Hi Markus, That is most interesting. I remember that occasion when TX was on later than usual. It will take a bit of tinkering to get the phase coherent exciter to the class E TX, but this is long ov
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00574.html (14,041 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:35:01 -0330 (NST)
Congrats on your grabber, Markus. The output was less than 5 watts, 0.4 amps RF so this is a true QRP TA reception. It almost appears as if the QRP path is a bit to the south by the greenish colour.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00575.html (15,904 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:03:25 +0100
Joe, when you were sending CW a couple of days ago, the coherent carrier was detectable in my 438 uHz spectrogram in broad daylight, until 12 UT! So I'm wondering how a low power straight carrier wou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00576.html (14,969 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:14:06 -0330 (NST)
Hi Hartmut, Yes, DCF39 must be a real pest as it is so close geographically and in frequency. You seem to be dealing with it very effectively. Thank-you for running the grabber. It's a pest over here
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00577.html (12,933 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:57:28 +0100
Yes Joe, 100% duty cycle would be ideal. But occasional CW or QRSS id's won't hurt either, as long as phase is being preserved. 73, Markus From: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 10,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00578.html (16,401 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:29:20 +0100
Am 2014-01-10 19:44, schrieb [email protected]: The TX will be on again tonight. In keeping with the spirit of energy conservation being requested by our power company, the TX will run at <5 watts tonigh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00579.html (11,561 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:03:25 -0330 (NST)
Hi Markus, Carrier on since 1920 UTC. 5 watts. While looking at the messy breadboard and trying to draw the schematic, I decided that it would be quicker to just run the Decca using the power supply
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00580.html (14,848 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:06:02 -0330 (NST)
Hi Hartmut, Thanks for running your grabber. If one squints at the spectrum around 0600, a callsign can be seen. Amazing reception for <5 watts! 73 Joe Am 2014-01-10 19:44, schrieb [email protected]: The
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00581.html (11,812 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:32:13 +0100
Joe, can't really say I'm seeing much here so far. Not even in 438 µHz, except for a couple of dim pixels in a row around 21 UT. Hartmut's grabber is doing much better at 11 mHz! Best 73, Markus (DF6
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00582.html (17,644 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:31:03 +0100
Joe, much brighter here since about 0:30! 73, Markus From: Markus Vester Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 1:32 AM To: [email protected] [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: Hartmut'
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-01/msg00583.html (18,372 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu