Dear Peter, hrd u 539 most time of last hour, called u several times on 7000.5, but no response. Wkd GM4HXO on QSX 3575. Maybe 80m will be better fer QSX DL? 73 Walter DI2AG / DJ2LF
Dear Peter, hrd u 539 most time of last hour, called u several times on 7000.5, but no response. Wkd GM4HXO on QSX 3575. Maybe 80m will be better fer QSX DL? 73 Walter DI2AG / DJ2LF Yes you are right
Hi Roman, LF, from my experience, I don't think that either SpecLab or Argo would generally be more sensitive than the other. If you use similar settings (eg. FFT resolution 0.34 Hz), then there is l
Many thanks for the report Roman Regards, Peter, G3LDO Looking to your freq too! qrss.nm.ru -> grabber 3 window 500-501.7 3rd window. But SPL... Is not so sensitive then ARGO. But I hope to see you.
Hi Peter, LF! Looking to your freq too! qrss.nm.ru -> grabber 3 window 500-501.7 3rd window. But SPL... Is not so sensitive then ARGO. But I hope to see you. -- Roman RW3ADB.
Hello LF! I have just seen signal of G3LDO in normal CW. Lubos, OK2BVG, JN88KS Hotmail: Bezplatná, dvryhodná a plnohodnotná e-mailová sluba Zaregistrovat = Attachment: 100204_G3LDO.JPG Description: J
Heard Peter G3LDO at 0925 today Tuesday 01/02/00 on 72.00 KHz calling 'QRZ'. Signals 100% copyable at 559. Called on 136 on the offchance you were listening there Peter, for a crossband QSO. 73 Tom,