Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+G3LDO\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: "Walter und Marianne Staubach" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 23:07:31 +0100
Dear Peter, hrd u 539 most time of last hour, called u several times on 7000.5, but no response. Wkd GM4HXO on QSX 3575. Maybe 80m will be better fer QSX DL? 73 Walter DI2AG / DJ2LF
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00007.html (7,933 bytes)

2. Re: LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dodd <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:26:35 +0000
Dear Peter, hrd u 539 most time of last hour, called u several times on 7000.5, but no response. Wkd GM4HXO on QSX 3575. Maybe 80m will be better fer QSX DL? 73 Walter DI2AG / DJ2LF Yes you are right
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-03/msg00472.html (8,824 bytes)

3. Re: LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Roman RW3ADB <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:07:33 +0400
You are stop to tx, Peter? Whats a real FREQ? Regards, Peter, G3LDO -- Roman RW3ADB.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00180.html (9,806 bytes)

4. Re: LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:00:36 -0400
Hi Roman, LF, from my experience, I don't think that either SpecLab or Argo would generally be more sensitive than the other. If you use similar settings (eg. FFT resolution 0.34 Hz), then there is l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00234.html (10,622 bytes)

5. Re: LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dodd <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:54:54 +0100
Many thanks for the report Roman Regards, Peter, G3LDO Looking to your freq too! qrss.nm.ru -> grabber 3 window 500-501.7 3rd window. But SPL... Is not so sensitive then ARGO. But I hope to see you.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00451.html (9,592 bytes)

6. LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Roman RW3ADB <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:41:10 +0400
Hi Peter, LF! Looking to your freq too! qrss.nm.ru -> grabber 3 window 500-501.7 3rd window. But SPL... Is not so sensitive then ARGO. But I hope to see you. -- Roman RW3ADB.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00506.html (8,694 bytes)

7. LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Roman RW3ADB <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:18:59 +0400
Hi Peter! Looking 501.1 ? Right? http://qrss.nm.ru/grabber.html -- Roman RW3ADB.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00138.html (7,574 bytes)

8. Re: LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dodd <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:35:04 +0100
Hi Roman, Thanks for the report Peter, G3LDO Hi Peter! Looking 501.1 ? Right? http://qrss.nm.ru/grabber.html -- Roman RW3ADB.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-10/msg00303.html (8,306 bytes)

9. LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: Lubos OK2BVG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:13:27 +0100
Hello LF! I have just seen signal of G3LDO in normal CW. Lubos, OK2BVG, JN88KS Hotmail: Bezplatná, dvryhodná a plnohodnotná e-mailová sluba Zaregistrovat = Attachment: 100204_G3LDO.JPG Description: J
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-02/msg00160.html (7,970 bytes)

10. LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:55:40 +0000
Heard Peter G3LDO at 0925 today Tuesday 01/02/00 on 72.00 KHz calling 'QRZ'. Signals 100% copyable at 559. Called on 136 on the offchance you were listening there Peter, for a crossband QSO. 73 Tom,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00014.html (7,529 bytes)

11. LF: G3LDO (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Rusgrove" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:16:19 -0500
Peter No joy...if you were transmitting this morning. Thunderstorms over Texas may have limited weak signal reception. Jay, W1VD
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00001.html (8,875 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu