Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Field\s+strength\s+revised\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Field strength revised (score: 1)
Author: "C Andersson" <>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:09:46 +0100
Hello All Thanks to PA0SE for suggesting the calibration method. I tried this method this evening and believe I'm somewhat closer to the truth... Obviously the measuring loop with the connection wiri
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00281.html (8,457 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Field strength revised (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:48:56
If you calibrate the loop it is not nessecary to use an untuned loop. If you use a tuned loop the output voltage will be much higher (factor Q, can easily be 100 or more). This will allow to measure
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00295.html (9,941 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Field strength revised (score: 1)
Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 17:27:01 +0200
Hejsan Christer, Just curious - how do you calculate your Fs. 0.3 W at 2 km should give 68 dB(uV/m) 0.6 W at 2 km should give 71 dB(uV/m) Both calculating and measuring Fs is difficult. Main point is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00298.html (10,905 bytes)

4. SV: LF: Field strength revised (score: 1)
Author: "C Andersson" <>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:29:48 +0100
If you calibrate the loop it is not nessecary to use an untuned loop. If you use a tuned loop the output voltage will be much higher (factor Q, can easily be 100 or more). This will allow to measure
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00299.html (8,570 bytes)

5. SV: LF: Field strength revised (score: 1)
Author: "C Andersson" <>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:34:10 +0100
OH2LX: Just curious - how do you calculate your Fs. P=0,0111*(E*d)^2 (P in W, E in mV/m, d in km) Main point is that you have very good signal!! Maybe. Just interested to see if it is possible to mak
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00300.html (8,558 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu